Across multiple studies, PYLARIFY was well-tolerated, with no individual adverse reaction occurring in more than 2% of patients1
Adverse reactions that occurred in >0.5% of patients who received PYLARIFY® (N=593)*
Adverse Reaction |
n (%) |
---|---|
Headache |
13 (2.0%) |
Dysgeusia |
10 (2.0%) |
Fatigue |
7 (1.0%) |
OSPREY was a robust, prospective, multicenter, phase 2/3 clinical trial of 385 patients with either high-risk prostate cancer (COHORT A; n=268) or radiologic evidence of recurrence (COHORT B; n=117)
OSPREY assessed the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in pelvic lymph nodes for PSMA-targeted PET scan with PYLARIFY
252 patients underwent surgery and had PLND evaluated locally by pathologists blinded to the imaging results. 16 patients did not undergo RP-PLND
- Specificity
- Sensitivity
- PPV
- Detection of M1 disease
- NPV
- Detection of primary tumor within the prostate
In COHORT A, OSPREY included patients across a broad range of PSA levels, disease stages, age ranges, and Gleason scores†
Median age (range) |
|
---|---|
65 (46-84) |
|
Race and ethnicity |
|
White |
86.9% |
Black or African American |
8.6% |
Hispanic |
4.1% |
Asian |
2.6% |
Other |
0.7% |
Regional lymph node (N) stage, AJCC‡ |
|
NX |
38.4% |
N0 |
58.2% |
N1 |
3.4% |
Primary tumor (T) stage, AJCC‡ |
|
---|---|
TX |
3% |
T1a |
0.4% |
T1b |
0.7% |
T1c |
32.5% |
T2 |
2.6% |
T2a |
16.8% |
T2b |
11.2% |
T2c |
5.2% |
T3 |
1.1% |
T3a |
20.9% |
T3b |
5.2% |
T4 |
0.4% |
Distance metastases (M) stage, AJCC‡ |
|
---|---|
Mx |
17.9% |
MO |
80.6% |
M1 |
0.4% |
M1a |
0% |
M1b |
0.4% |
M1c |
0% |
Median PSA (ng/mL), (range) |
|
9.7 (1.2-125.3) |
|
Total Gleason score |
|
6 |
1.1% |
7 |
18.3% |
8 |
44.8% |
9 |
34.3% |
10 |
1.5% |
CONDOR was a robust, multicenter, phase 3 trial of 208 patients with suspected recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer with negative or equivocal results using standard imaging
CONDOR assessed correct localization rate (CLR)—an improved metric for evaluating diagnostic performance compared to PPV—in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer
For patients treated with RP, BCR was defined as a rising PSA to ≥0.2 ng/mL
For patients treated with RT, BCR was defined as a PSA value ≥2 ng/mL above patient’s post-radiation nadir value
Reference standards of truth in CONDOR
Because most patients were not expected to have an amenable lesion for histological verification, a composite standard of truth was discussed with the FDA based on these reference standards (in order of priority):
- Evaluable histopathology results from prostatectomy, salvage pelvic lymph node dissection, or targeted biopsy
- Correlative follow-up imaging findings using 18F-fluciclovine or 11C-choline PET, or focused MRI or CT
- If neither of the above was available or informative, confirmed PSA response§ up to 9 months post-radiation initiation (without concomitant ADT) of all PET-positive foci
§PSA response was defined as PSA decline by ≥50% from baseline that was confirmed on repeat measurement within 4 weeks, based on central laboratory results.
CONDOR included patients with a broad range of PSA levels and Gleason scores†
Median age (range) |
|
---|---|
68 (43-91) |
|
Patients ≥65 years old |
|
67.8% |
|
Median months from PCa diagnosis (range) |
|
71 (3-356) |
Prior prostate cancer therapies |
|
---|---|
Radical prostatectomy only |
49.5% |
Radiation therapy only |
14.9% |
Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy |
35.6% |
At least 1 prior systemic therapy |
27.9% |
Gleason score |
|
<8 |
73.6% |
≥8 |
26.4% |
PSA (ng/mL): Median (range) 0.8 (0.17-98.45) |
|
---|---|
<0.5 |
34.2% |
0.5-<1.0 |
18.3% |
1.0-<2.0 |
16.3% |
2.0-<5.0 |
16.3% |
≥5.0 |
14.9% |
OSPREY was a robust, prospective, multicenter, phase 2/3 clinical trial of 385 patients with either high-risk prostate cancer (COHORT A; n=268) or radiologic evidence of recurrence (COHORT B; n=117)
In COHORT B, OSPREY assessed sensitivity and PPV in patients with radiologic evidence of recurrence
Lesions (biopsy) detected by conventional imaging, evaluated for presence or absence of PCa, other neoplasm, or deemed unevaluable
- Specificity
- Sensitivity
References
- PYLARIFY® [package insert]. North Billerica, MA: Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Lantheus company.
- Pienta KJ, Gorin MA, Rowe SP, et al. A phase 2/3 prospective multicenter study of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate specific membrane antigen PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL in prostate cancer patients (OSPREY). J Urol. 2021;206(1):52-61.
- Morris MJ, Rowe SP, Gorin MA, et al. Diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: results from the CONDOR phase III, multicenter study. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(13):3674-3682.