Compared to standard imaging, PSMA-targeted PET scan with PYLARIFY delivered:
- Significantly higher specificity (97.9% vs 65.1%)
- Nearly 3 times the PPV (86.7% vs 28.3%)
- Similar sensitivity to standard imaging
In a post-hoc analysis, PYLARIFY achieved the success criteria for sensitivity and specificity across lymph nodes >5 mm1
- Sensitivity
- Specificity
- PPV
- NPV
Median of 3 independent readers
Post-hoc analysis (Pelvic lymph nodes >5 mm)1 n=225
Adapted from Pienta KJ, et al. In: J Urol. 2021.
Primary analysis (All pelvic lymph nodes)2 n=252
Adapted from PYLARIFY® Prescribing Information. 2021.
- In the pre-specified analysis, the specificity of co-primary endpoint with PSMA-targeted PET scan with PYLARIFY® was met (the lower limits of the 95% CIs for all readers were >80%), but the sensitivity co-primary endpoint was not met, in part due to limitations in PET/CT image resolution for tumors smaller than 5 mm1,3,4
- PSMA-targeted PET scan with PYLARIFY achieved high PPV (range: 72%-81%) and NPV (81%-84%), reducing the risk of undertreatment2
References
- Pienta KJ, Gorin MA, Rowe SP, et al. A phase 2/3 prospective multicenter study of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate specific membrane antigen PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL in prostate cancer patients (OSPREY). J Urol. 2021;206(1):52-61.
- PYLARIFY® [package insert]. North Billerica, MA: Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Lantheus company.
- Crippa F, Leutner M, Belli F, et al. Which kinds of lymph node metastases can FDG PET detect? A clinical study in melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(9):1491-1494.
- Alipour R, Azad A, Hofman MS. Guiding management of therapy in prostate cancer: time to switch from conventional imaging to PSMA PET? Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019;11:1-14.