PYLARIFY Logo

Compared to standard imaging, PSMA-targeted PET scan with PYLARIFY delivered:

  • Significantly higher specificity (97.9% vs 65.1%)
  • Nearly 3 times the PPV (86.7% vs 28.3%)
  • Similar sensitivity to standard imaging

In a post-hoc analysis, PYLARIFY achieved the success criteria for sensitivity and specificity across lymph nodes  >5 mm1

  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity
  • PPV
  • NPV

Median of 3 independent readers

Post-hoc analysis (Pelvic lymph nodes >5 mm)1 n=225

Adapted from Pienta KJ, et al. In: J Urol. 2021.

60.0
(95% CI: 0.44, 0.76)
97.9
(95% CI: 0.95, 0.99)
84.6
(95% CI: 0.66, 0.94)
92.9
(95% CI: 0.89, 0.97)

Primary analysis (All pelvic lymph nodes)2 n=252

Adapted from PYLARIFY® Prescribing Information. 2021.

38.0
(95% CI: 0.26, 0.51)
96.0
(95% CI: 0.94, 0.99)
77.0
(95% CI: 0.62, 0.92)
83.0
(95% CI: 0.78, 0.88)
  • In the pre-specified analysis, the specificity of co-primary endpoint with PSMA-targeted PET scan with PYLARIFY® was met (the lower limits of the 95% CIs for all readers were >80%), but the sensitivity co-primary endpoint was not met, in part due to limitations in PET/CT image resolution for tumors smaller than 5 mm1,3,4
  • PSMA-targeted PET scan with PYLARIFY achieved high PPV (range: 72%-81%) and NPV (81%-84%), reducing the risk of undertreatment2
CI=confidence interval; CT=computed tomography; NPV=negative predictive value; PET=positron emission tomography; PPV=positive predictive value; PSMA=prostate-specific membrane antigen

References

  1. Pienta KJ, Gorin MA, Rowe SP, et al. A phase 2/3 prospective multicenter study of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate specific membrane antigen PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL in prostate cancer patients (OSPREY). J Urol. 2021;206(1):52-61. 
  2. PYLARIFY® [package insert]. North Billerica, MA: Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Lantheus company. 
  3. Crippa F, Leutner M, Belli F, et al. Which kinds of lymph node metastases can FDG PET detect? A clinical study in melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(9):1491-1494. 
  4. Alipour R, Azad A, Hofman MS. Guiding management of therapy in prostate cancer: time to switch from conventional imaging to PSMA PET? Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019;11:1-14.